Archive for November, 2006

The New Space Race

Monday, November 13th, 2006

Florida, the nation’s premier launch site since the 1960s thanks to NASA’s largesse, is in danger of being eclipsed in a fast-changing space race.

In less than four years when the space shuttle program ends, one-third of the 15,000 space-related jobs on Florida’s Space Coast will be eliminated.

Meanwhile, a growing number of billionaire businessmen are proving that space is not just NASA anymore. These entrepreneurs, used to thinking big while profiting bigger, are into everything from commercial satellite launches to space tourism. And, instead of heading to Florida, they’re taking their fledgling businesses to places as far-flung as an atoll in the Pacific Ocean and Star City, Russia.

Kennedy Space Center in Titusville, the nation’s first spaceport, has even been upstaged by New Mexico, which ponied up more than $200-million to build a spaceport in the desert and signed Richard Branson’s Virgin Galactic as its first tenant. Coming soon: suborbital flights at $200,000 a pop.

Amid this growing competition for space business, Florida has created a new space organization. But it has hired a guy from Pennsylvania with no aerospace background to run the show.

Surprising? Not at all, said Steve Kohler, the man selected by Gov. Jeb Bush to head Space Florida, which replaced a confusing trifecta of state bureaucracies: Florida Space Authority, Florida Space Research Institute and Florida Aerospace Finance Corp.

“What was sought was a completely fresh outlook,” said Kohler, who started work at a temporary office at Kennedy Space Center on Oct. 2. “I’m coming with a wide-open aperture.”

Kohler, 49, has a strong background in economic development, having once headed a task force for then-Pennsylvania Gov. Tom Ridge that brought thousands of jobs to the ailing Rust Belt. That, say Kohler’s supporters, is more important than being well-versed in the aerospace industry.

“We can teach him about space - that the pointy end goes up,” said Jim Banke, vice president of Florida operations for the nonprofit Space Foundation and a member of Space Florida’s spaceport subcommittee. “It’s the guts of economic development we’ve got to be concerned about. This is all about people having good work in the Sunshine State.”

The pressure is on. The shuttle program has required the skills of a standing army of thousands of engineers and systems inspectors. The nation’s next stage of space travel - the Constellation program that will take Americans back to the moon and eventually to Mars - is going to use Apollo-like capsules atop rockets that won’t require the same degree of maintenance. These spacecraft, to be built by Lockheed Martin, won’t begin flying until at least 2012.

Banke, an aerospace journalist for 20 years, said it has taken Florida’s NASA-centric community a couple of years for the reality of the shuttle’s imminent demise to sink in.

“We can no longer just wait for NASA to send its check down from Washington,” he said. “We’ve got to move quickly and do something bold, something visible to show we mean business.”

Space Florida was created after a yearlong review of the state’s aerospace industry led by Lt. Gov. Toni Jennings. Even as Jennings’ commission was meeting, insiders were working feverishly to nail down a major deal: Lockheed’s promise to perform final assembly and integration of the Orion spacecraft at Kennedy Space Center. Cost to Florida: $35-million to refurbish a mothballed Apollo facility. Benefit: 300 to 400 jobs.

Now Space Florida’s leader has to use the Orion assembly deal as leverage to persuade Lockheed’s subcontractors to manufacture in Florida. Kohler compared the challenge to an effort in Pennsylvania, when he tried to bring suppliers for an $80-million General Electric locomotive project into the state.

“It’s all about penetrating more deeply into the supply chain operations,” he said. “The human infrastructure that exists in this region is a distinct advantage. There’s a larger-than-average number of highly trained technical professionals. We just need to identify these people and do the appropriate matchmaking. Or in some cases, just get out of the way and allow the commercial connections to work.”

Kohler’s next priority will be to woo the two commercial launch companies recently awarded NASA contracts to provide service to the International Space Station after the shuttle retires. These companies, SpaceX in El Segundo, Calif., and Rocketplane Kistler in Oklahoma City, are charged with finding the most cost-efficient, reliable way to move cargo and crew to low-Earth orbit. Kistler plans to launch its rocket from southern Australia. SpaceX has built a launch site on Kwajalein in the Marshall Islands, northeast of Australia.

Elon Musk, SpaceX’s chief executive, said the atoll was chosen because it’s close to the equator, has a wider range of launch directions and is cheaper than Cape Canaveral. But Musk, who co-founded PayPal, expects to launch from the Cape in a few years, despite daunting regulatory demands and expense.

“Florida needs to remain focused on ensuring that the bureaucracy is kept to a minimum and that Florida is the most cost-effective place to launch rockets,” said Musk, who has invested $100-million of his fortune into SpaceX. “It’s just like a city trying to attract Southwest Airlines.”

The analogy is telling because many people think aerospace will develop along the same path as general aviation, with government and military spending eventually being dwarfed by expenditures in the commercial and tourist industry.

“In 10, 20 or 30 years, the new business will surpass what we have now,” said Winston Scott, an astronaut who headed Florida Space Authority from 2003 until July and works for a NASA subcontractor in Houston. “Florida needs to lay the infrastructure now. Otherwise, they’ll be second to other states.”

Dr. Peter Diamandis, who co-founded Zero Gravity Corp., Space Adventures and the X Prize competition, has spent the past 20 years trying to make space accessible to the average person. Though Zero-G started flying out of Kennedy Space Center in June, Diamandis said the company made a proposal to the state a year ago to base Zero-G’s growing education and research program in Florida. He is waiting for a response.

“Houston, Las Vegas and San Diego have been extremely interested in courting us,” said Diamandis, who was to meet with Space Florida’s Kohler this weekend.

“It’s really Florida’s option to lose.”

Share and Enjoy:These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • blinkbits
  • BlinkList
  • blogmarks
  • co.mments
  • connotea
  • del.icio.us
  • De.lirio.us
  • digg
  • Fark
  • feedmelinks
  • Furl
  • LinkaGoGo
  • Ma.gnolia
  • NewsVine
  • Netvouz
  • RawSugar
  • Reddit
  • scuttle
  • Shadows
  • Simpy
  • Smarking
  • Spurl
  • TailRank
  • Wists
  • YahooMyWeb

Rollercoaster to be Used for Ares 1 Escape

Monday, November 6th, 2006

NASA Constellation have approved the Rollercoaster Escape System to be used as the Emergency Egress Systems (EES) for astronauts and pad crew to race away from the Ares I pad, should an emergency be called.The Rollercoaster system led the September trade study as the preferred option, and will now be offered as a contract to potential vendors.

Share and Enjoy:These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • blinkbits
  • BlinkList
  • blogmarks
  • co.mments
  • connotea
  • del.icio.us
  • De.lirio.us
  • digg
  • Fark
  • feedmelinks
  • Furl
  • LinkaGoGo
  • Ma.gnolia
  • NewsVine
  • Netvouz
  • RawSugar
  • Reddit
  • scuttle
  • Shadows
  • Simpy
  • Smarking
  • Spurl
  • TailRank
  • Wists
  • YahooMyWeb

Irvin Aerospace to Design Orion Parachutes

Monday, November 6th, 2006

Irvin Aerospace, the world’s first parachute engineering, design and manufacturing company founded in 1919, was selected by Jacobs Sverdrup for NASA to develop parachutes for NASA’s Orion Crew Exploration Vehicle (CEV). Following the space shuttles retirement in 2010, NASA plans to replace the aging shuttle fleet with a number of reusable Orion spacecraft. Orion is expected to carry crew members to the International Space Station, the Moon and beyond.

Working with an integrated product team (IPT) that includes NASA, Jacobs Sverdrup, and engineers from Irvin Aerospace, the design team will develop a CEV Parachute Assembly System (CPAS) which is scheduled to begin testing in approximately 6 months.

“We are extremely pleased with the opportunity to work with Jacobs and NASA,” said Dave Berry, President of Irvin Aerospace. “Our company is very proud to be selected and we will focus our energies on working together in support of our Nation’s Space Program.”

Irvin is also working with NASA’s Langley Research Center to explore the suitability of a Landing Airbag System for the final landing attenuation for the Orion spacecraft. Irvin was recently awarded a development contract from Rocketplane Kistler under NASA’s recent Commercial Orbital Transpiration Services (COTS) program to complete the development of the RpK K-1 vehicle to provide commercial cargo deliver and eventually crew delivery services to the International Space Station.

The Orion contract award will add 10-15 engineering positions at Irvin’s Santa Ana, California headquarters as well as a number of high skilled manufacturing positions. In addition, the RpK COTS award is expected to provide a similar number of engineering and manufacturing jobs.

Share and Enjoy:These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • blinkbits
  • BlinkList
  • blogmarks
  • co.mments
  • connotea
  • del.icio.us
  • De.lirio.us
  • digg
  • Fark
  • feedmelinks
  • Furl
  • LinkaGoGo
  • Ma.gnolia
  • NewsVine
  • Netvouz
  • RawSugar
  • Reddit
  • scuttle
  • Shadows
  • Simpy
  • Smarking
  • Spurl
  • TailRank
  • Wists
  • YahooMyWeb

The Importance of International Collaboration in Space Exploration

Friday, November 3rd, 2006

Remarks by The Honorable Shana Dale Deputy Administrator National Aeronautics and Space AdministrationBefore the AAS/AIAA Seminar “Importance of International Collaboration in Space Exploration” 1 November 2006

Thank you for those kind words and thank you for inviting me to this seminar today. These are exciting and busy times in the space business and I firmly believe we should continue vigorous and healthy dialogue about how we conduct space exploration with our international partners. To that end, Mike Griffin gave a speech last month at the International Astronautical Congress highlighting both the importance that NASA places on international involvement in our programs and some of the key issues that we must address as we proceed together into a new era of space exploration. Some observers described Mike’s speech as “uncharacteristically blunt.” I think that we can all agree that an open and honest dialogue about our nation’s goals for international collaboration in space exploration is exactly what is needed in order to make progress going forward.

It is fitting that this seminar be held on a George Mason University campus. I appreciate the wisdom that George Mason imparted to our nation. He was a blunt speaker and the lead author for the Virginia Constitution and Declaration of Rights, whose philosophies formed the basis for our national government’s role in protecting individual rights, liberties, and properties in the Bill of Rights of the United States’ Constitution. George Mason enjoyed a vigorous debate about our nation’s future and our nation’s role in the world.

Our founding fathers had great challenges before them, just as we have today. Space exploration, whether human or robotic, is still the grandest and most technically challenging expression of human imagination. Thus, George Mason’s 18th century wisdom still has relevance to us today when we recall his words, “A few years’ experience will convince us that those things which at the time they happened we regarded as our greatest misfortunes have proved our greatest blessings.”

This saying holds especially true when considering the Hubble Space Telescope. Yesterday, we announced our decision to proceed with another Shuttle servicing mission to the Hubble. Based on what we have learned and developed in the wake of the Space Shuttle Columbia accident, extensive reviews from the last three Shuttle missions, and careful consideration of the risks, costs, and potential scientific benefit of such a Shuttle servicing mission in extending the life of the Hubble, we decided to proceed. It was a carefully considered decision, but the right one to make.

The Hubble Space Telescope has an amazing history. The idea for a space telescope was first proposed in 1923 by German rocket scientist Herman Oberth to avoid cloudy nights of observation of the Earth’s atmosphere, and Lyman Spitzer advocated for such an “extra-terrestrial observatory” in the 1940s. It took many decades before technology caught up with this idea. The telescope was carried onboard the Space Shuttle Discovery in 1990, and soon after its on-orbit checkout, astronomers discovered a slight aberration in the mirror’s curvature that was far less than the width of a single human hair, but it still prevented the Hubble telescope from producing sharp images from the edge of the visible universe. Thus, in December 1993, astronauts repaired the Hubble with small corrective mirrors. It has been repaired and improved three other times in the intervening years by our Space Shuttle crews.

The Hubble Space Telescope has made some of the greatest discoveries in the history of astronomy. The Hubble also stands as a testament to perseverance and cooperation between NASA and the European Space Agency. Two separate aims of our Vision for Space Exploration are to conduct advanced telescope searches for Earth-like planets and habitable environments around other stars and pursue opportunities for international cooperation in carrying out NASA’s mission. To that end, we’re working closely with ESA on the James Webb Space Telescope. Our European partners are providing instruments for the observatory and an Ariane 5 launch vehicle to get it into orbit. The Canadian Space Agency is building the satellite’s guidance system, and, of course, the lead project scientist for the Webb Space Telescope is NASA’s first civil servant to win the Nobel Prize, Dr. John Mather!

Our international cooperation does not start or end with the Hubble and JWST missions. Of NASA’s 42 on-going space and Earth science missions, over half of them have international participation, and of those NASA missions under development today, almost 2/3 have international involvement. The astronomy and astrophysics community should be proud of how we are leveraging the investments in this great enterprise.

NASA astronomers are working with CNES, the French Space Agency, for imagery and insights to be gleaned from the soon-to-be launched COROT space telescope to survey extra-solar planets with periods of less than 75 days. In a few years, NASA’s Kepler space telescope will survey such Earth-like planets with periods of less than one year – or – what is considered a habitable zone for extra-solar life. Then, ESA’s ambitious GAIA mission not only will chart a three-dimensional map of our Milky Way galaxy, but it also should help detect and classify tens of thousands of extra-solar planets.

Looking at all of these efforts along with many ground-based telescope efforts, astronomers have certainly entered a Golden Age of Discovery when it comes to the search for extra-solar planets. That being said, NASA simply cannot afford every mission that every astronomer would like us to do as soon as they would like us to do it. With significantly under-estimated costs for the James Webb Space Telescope, additional costs for the next Hubble Servicing Mission and continuation of the SOFIA program, we decided the best course was to turn the Space Interferometry Mission and Terrestrial Planet-Finding missions into technology development efforts for the time being. That carefully-considered decision was based in part on the fact that the SOFIA mission is more highly ranked in the National Academy of Sciences decadal survey for astronomy missions than the SIM mission.

This past year, I worked closely with Professor Sigmar Wittig of DLR, the German Aerospace Center, and others to address the management challenges associated with the SOFIA program. Based on our careful review of SOFIA and working with our German partners, I believe we’re tackling the challenges of this troubled, yet executable, program. When it is operational, this mission will provide the astrophysics community with regular access to the largest airborne observatory in the world, and will make observations that are impossible for even the largest and highest of ground-based telescopes.

With the largest hole ever put into the side of a 747, the SOFIA aircraft is, most definitely, an experimental aircraft, and it is for this reason that NASA’s Dryden Flight Research Center has taken over management of the aircraft. At NASA, we are attempting to find the best match between the work and the skills available at our field centers. Dryden has the experience necessary in making complex modifications to research aircraft, and thus, has the expertise to get the job done in testing and check-out for such an experimental aircraft, while working with the project scientists at Ames.

The Hubble Space Telescope, JWST, and SOFIA are just a small part of NASA’s mission of scientific discovery currently underway with our international partners. I would like to spend the rest of my time here speaking to how to build on the framework for international cooperation already begun by NASA’s science community and International Space Station partnership. One of the greatest values from the ISS partnership is the partnership itself. For this reason, the Vision for Space Exploration honors existing commitments with our international partners, while committing NASA to new endeavors with our international partners. This will not be easy— completing assembly of the ISS; retiring the Space Shuttle; building the Orion CEV, Ares launch vehicles, and lunar landers; returning to the Moon and setting a course onward to Mars—the Vision for Space Exploration is NASA’s greatest challenge. But, as President John Kennedy said at Rice University in 1962, we do these things, “not because they are easy, but because they are hard.”

Thus, we look forward to working together with our international partners in this endeavor. We seek to build on our ISS partnership and scientific collaborations in exploring the charted and uncharted territory on the Moon and Mars. We also want to try to bring other countries into our framework for cooperation, such as the fruitful collaboration currently underway between NASA and the Indian Space Research Organization which is hosting two NASA payloads on their Chandrayaan-1 spacecraft to the Moon.

The first step in this process had to be development of the Exploration Systems Architecture Study, under Mike Griffin’s leadership. The Study developed the basic space transportation elements now known as the Orion Crew Exploration Vehicle and the Ares launch vehicles. We are now in the initial phase of the process to design, develop, and test these vehicles. As a parallel activity, with your help, we are now in the process of developing our strategies for what lunar activities would be best to pursue. Thus, we are canvassing the interests of other nations, as well as scientific and commercial interests, in what we might accomplish together in exploring the Moon. We must carefully choose those endeavors to which we eventually commit ourselves with our fellow spacefaring nations.

Much as we would wish otherwise, we cannot afford everything that many constituencies and interests would like us to do. There simply isn’t enough money in the universe. In this context, it is clear that partnerships work best when all partners contribute resources toward a common goal that is greater than that which could be easily afforded by any single partner alone, and, it is important to set realistic schedule milestones and to maintain clear interfaces. I am extremely pleased with the steps taken thus far in formulating a lunar international exploration strategy. In April of this year, NASA hosted a workshop with over 200 participants, including individuals from 13 nations.

Synthesizing this input, some common themes have since emerged when approaching lunar exploration. First, the Moon is worth studying in its own right, and just as we are learning to live and work in space onboard the ISS, we should try next to learn to live and work productively on another world altogether. In case of emergencies, a return to the Earth from the ISS only takes a few hours, a return from the Moon takes a few days, and a return from Mars takes several months. It is obvious that the Moon is the next logical step.

As President Bush pointed out when announcing the Vision for Space Exploration, “We will make steady progress – one mission, one voyage, one landing at a time.” This incremental approach will sustain our journey, and certain ideas for exploiting the Moon’s vantage point and resources will not be possible until we have established a significant presence on the Moon and incorporate it into our economic sphere. As my former boss, the President’s Science Advisor Jack Marburger, stated in a speech earlier this year, “Questions about the vision boil down to whether we want to incorporate the Solar System in our economic sphere, or not. Our national policy, declared by President Bush and endorsed by Congress last December in the NASA Authorization Act, affirmatively answers that question: The fundamental goal of this vision is to advance U.S. scientific, security, and economic interests through a robust space exploration program.”

NASA cannot carry out the exploration of the Moon and Mars on its own. We need the best ideas, and we need to leverage the capabilities of our international partners just as they want to leverage our capabilities. I believe the dialogue we’re establishing at this seminar and later workshops is helping to lay the groundwork for us to return to the Moon and extend our reach to the rest of the solar system together. During the next year, we will work with the international community to complete a framework for the global exploration strategy that will allow us to share individual agency architectures and determine a mechanism by which our exploration activities can continue to be coordinated.

Like the Hubble Space Telescope, the journey ahead of us hopefully will stand as a testament to perseverance and cooperation. We have many issues and challenges before us, so let us speak frankly to each other. Quoting from George Mason, “Happiness and Prosperity are now within our Reach; but to attain and preserve them must depend upon our own Wisdom and Virtue.”

Share and Enjoy:These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • blinkbits
  • BlinkList
  • blogmarks
  • co.mments
  • connotea
  • del.icio.us
  • De.lirio.us
  • digg
  • Fark
  • feedmelinks
  • Furl
  • LinkaGoGo
  • Ma.gnolia
  • NewsVine
  • Netvouz
  • RawSugar
  • Reddit
  • scuttle
  • Shadows
  • Simpy
  • Smarking
  • Spurl
  • TailRank
  • Wists
  • YahooMyWeb